Scientists submit letter calling for rejection of Roberts Bank Terminal 2 project

Letter from 12 scientists urges Minister of Environment to reject the VFPA’s proposed shipping expansion in the Fraser River Estuary

VANCOUVER, BC, Feb. 10, 2022 /CNW/ – A group of leading scientists have written to Honourable Steven Guilbeault, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada, urging him to reject the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority’s (VFPA) proposed Roberts Bank Terminal II (RBT2) project if the government is committed to the recovery of threatened and endangered species that rely on the Fraser River Estuary.

The letter, co-authored by 12 scientists with expertise on Chinook salmon, Southern Resident killer whales and the Fraser River Estuary, cite the Canadian Environment Assessment Agency’s (now the Impact Assessment Agency) report that found RBT2 will have significant adverse and cumulative effects on certain Fraser Chinook salmon populations and Southern Resident killer whales.

The letter also expresses concern for VFPA’s reliance on ‘habitat offsetting’ as a mechanism to compensate for the loss of habitat incurred to Chinook salmon. The scientists cited a study  that found only 33% of previous habitat compensation projects implemented by the VFPA have achieved their intended ecological outcomes to offset adverse effects from their projects. A Canadian-wide study of fish habitat compensation projects found that it was simply not possible to compensate for some habitats.

 Dr. Ken Ashley, the Director of the Rivers Institute at the British Columbia Institute of Technology, states that “the Fraser estuary is the most ecologically sensitive and threatened ecosystem in the entire Fraser River. After experiencing myriad developmental pressures for over a century, it now faces an uncertain future due to continuing threats from large developmental proposals such as RBT2″.

Considering this, and the significant adverse effects anticipated on Chinook salmon and Southern Resident killer whales, the scientists state there is a clear biological rationale for rejecting the project if their recovery is a priority for the Government of Canada.

“We evaluated the threats facing 102 species of conservation concern in the Fraser River Estuary and found that pursuing projects that further reduce the habitat for these at-risk species will only further their decline.  Our research shows that species recovery requires implementing cost-effective conservation-based science that is supported by a management plan and co-governance”, Dr. Tara Martin, Professor in the Forest and Conservation Science Department at the University of British Columbia.

If Minister Guilbeault does reject the project, it would demonstrate the Federal government’s stated commitment to legislation like Canada’s Species at Risk Act and directive policies under the Fisheries Act to recover species and populations.

Contacts

For media inquiries, please contact the RBT2 science letter representatives below

Dr. Ken Ashley, PhD
Instructor and Director, Rivers Institute,  British Columbia Institute of Technology
EMAIl: [email protected]
PHONE: (604)-432-8270

Dr. Tara Martin, PhD
Tara Martin, PhD, Professor, Liber Ero Chair of Conservation, University of British Columbia
EMAIL: [email protected]
PHONE: (250)-221-1241

Richard Bailey, MSc
Retired scientist, Former Chinook and Coho Program Head, Fisheries and Oceans Canada
EMAIL: [email protected]
PHONE: (250) 319-8568

Dr. Marvin Rosenau, PhD
Faculty Associate and Instructor, British Columbia Institute of Technology
EMAIL: [email protected]
PHONE: (604)-744-5938.

Dr. Deborah Giles, PhD
Science and Research Director, Wild Orca
EMAIL: [email protected]
PHONE: (916)-531-1516

Press assets

Website and letter
Photo and videos
Fraser Estuary Scientist Letter

SOURCE Pink Sheep Media

Scientists submit letter calling for rejection of Roberts Bank Terminal 2 project WeeklyReviewer

PR Newswire Political/Government News

Earnings Disclosure

WeeklyReviewer earns primarily through affiliates and ads. We don’t encourage anyone to click on ads for any other purpose but your own. We recommend products and services often for our readers, and through many we will earn commissions through affiliate programs.

WeeklyReviewer earns commissions through affiliates of qualifying products through Amazon Associates, Fiverr Affiliates, Hostgator Affiliates, Namecheap Affiliates, NordVPN Affiliates, Semrush Affiliates, Alibaba Affiliates, Clickfunnels Affiliate, Leadpages Affiliates, Cryptohopper Affiliates, Binance Affiliates and more.

Clicking on links in WeeklyReviewer may or may not provide us commission through any qualifying purchases.

World Reviewer Staff
World Reviewer Staffhttps://weeklyreviewer.com/
The first logical thought has to be "no way". I'm the World Observer! Ill find and share important news all day.

Latest articles

Related articles

WeeklyReviewer